Home / Issues / European Commission 2009 abuse-of-dominance decision against Intel (€1.06bn fine), fine later annulled by the EU courts
European Commission 2009 abuse-of-dominance decision against Intel (€1.06bn fine), fine later annulled by the EU courts
Decidedas of 31 Oct 2026European Union / EEAIntel Corporationdraft
Current status
Confirmed fact · as of 24 Oct 2024
The €1.06 billion fine imposed by the Commission in 2009 was annulled in its entirety by the General Court on 26 January 2022, and that annulment was upheld by the Court of Justice on 24 October 2024; the fine has no legal effect.
A General Court of the European Union, Press release No 16/22: Judgment in Case T-286/09 RENV, Intel Corporation v Commission (26 Jan 2022) · retrieved 31 Oct 2026 · A Court of Justice of the European Union, Press release No 185/24: Judgment in Case C-240/22 P, Commission v Intel Corporation (24 Oct 2024) · retrieved 31 Oct 2026
Confirmed fact · as of 31 Oct 2026
The courts annulled the conditional-rebates abuse finding; this is a mixed outcome rather than a clean finding against Intel, and the separate 'naked restrictions' finding in the 2009 decision was not annulled by the General Court.
A General Court of the European Union, Press release No 16/22: Judgment in Case T-286/09 RENV, Intel Corporation v Commission (26 Jan 2022) · retrieved 31 Oct 2026
Confirmed fact · as of 31 Oct 2026
This was an administrative/regulatory competition proceeding; it is not a criminal matter and involves no criminal conviction.
A European Commission, Antitrust: Commission imposes fine of €1.06 bn on Intel for abuse of dominant position; orders Intel to cease illegal practices (IP/09/745) (13 May 2009) · retrieved 31 Oct 2026
Superseding event · 24 Oct 2024
The Court of Justice's dismissal of the Commission's appeal on 24 October 2024 (Case C-240/22 P) made the General Court's annulment of the €1.06 billion fine final.
A Court of Justice of the European Union, Press release No 185/24: Judgment in Case C-240/22 P, Commission v Intel Corporation (24 Oct 2024) · retrieved 31 Oct 2026
Last reviewed 31 Oct 2026. An initial allegation is not the final event; this block is always shown.
How it unfolded
Issue raised · 13 May 2009
Proposition: On 13 May 2009 the European Commission decided that Intel Corporation had abused its dominant position on the market for x86 central processing units, in breach of Article 82 of the EC Treaty (now Article 102 TFEU), through conditional (loyalty) rebates granted to computer manufacturers and a retailer on condition that they bought all or most of their x86 CPUs from Intel, and through payments to manufacturers to halt or delay the launch of products containing a rival's CPUs ('naked restrictions'); the Commission imposed a fine of €1.06 billion and ordered Intel to cease the illegal practices.
Affected parties: Intel Corporation, European Commission, Competing x86 CPU suppliers
Originating record: A European Commission, Antitrust: Commission imposes fine of €1.06 bn on Intel for abuse of dominant position; orders Intel to cease illegal practices (IP/09/745) (13 May 2009) · retrieved 31 Oct 2026
Response · Intel Corporation · 13 May 2009
Attributed claim · as of 24 Oct 2024
Intel contested the Commission's decision and brought an action for annulment before the General Court. After an initial General Court judgment (2014) and a referral back by the Court of Justice (2017), the General Court in the renvoi proceedings (Case T-286/09 RENV) annulled the conditional-rebates part of the decision and the entire fine. The Commission's subsequent appeal to the Court of Justice was dismissed. — Intel Corporation
A General Court of the European Union, Press release No 16/22: Judgment in Case T-286/09 RENV, Intel Corporation v Commission (26 Jan 2022) · retrieved 31 Oct 2026 · A Court of Justice of the European Union, Press release No 185/24: Judgment in Case C-240/22 P, Commission v Intel Corporation (24 Oct 2024) · retrieved 31 Oct 2026
Outcome · General Court of the European Union (Case T-286/09 RENV), upheld on appeal by the Court of Justice (Case C-240/22 P) · 26 Jan 2022
judgmentbinding
Confirmed fact · as of 24 Oct 2024
The European Commission's decision of 13 May 2009 found that Intel abused a dominant position and imposed a €1.06 billion fine (IP/09/745). On 26 January 2022, in Case T-286/09 RENV, the General Court partly annulled that decision: it held that the Commission's analysis of the conditional rebates was incomplete and did not establish to the required legal standard that the rebates were capable of having anticompetitive effects, and it annulled the decision insofar as it found those rebates to be an abuse under Article 102 TFEU. Because it could not determine how much of the fine related solely to the separate 'naked restrictions', the General Court annulled 'in its entirety the article of the contested decision which imposes on Intel a fine of €1.06 billion'. On 24 October 2024, in Case C-240/22 P, the Court of Justice dismissed the Commission's appeal, upholding the General Court's judgment, so the annulment of the fine became final. This is a mixed outcome, not a clean finding against Intel: the rebates finding and the whole fine were annulled, while the General Court did not annul the separate finding on 'naked restrictions'. The matter was an administrative competition proceeding, not a criminal one.
A European Commission, Antitrust: Commission imposes fine of €1.06 bn on Intel for abuse of dominant position; orders Intel to cease illegal practices (IP/09/745) (13 May 2009) · retrieved 31 Oct 2026 · A General Court of the European Union, Press release No 16/22: Judgment in Case T-286/09 RENV, Intel Corporation v Commission (26 Jan 2022) · retrieved 31 Oct 2026 · A Court of Justice of the European Union, Press release No 185/24: Judgment in Case C-240/22 P, Commission v Intel Corporation (24 Oct 2024) · retrieved 31 Oct 2026
Remedy: The €1.06 billion fine was annulled in its entirety by the General Court (26 January 2022); the annulment was upheld by the Court of Justice (24 October 2024). The conditional-rebates abuse finding was annulled; the separate 'naked restrictions' finding was not annulled.
Appeal/review: concluded — The European Commission appealed the General Court's 2022 judgment to the Court of Justice (Case C-240/22 P). On 24 October 2024 the Court of Justice dismissed the Commission's appeal, finding no error in the General Court's assessment of the capacity of the rebates to foreclose competition or in its application of the standard of proof to the as-efficient-competitor test; the annulment of the fine therefore stands. A Court of Justice of the European Union, Press release No 185/24: Judgment in Case C-240/22 P, Commission v Intel Corporation (24 Oct 2024) · retrieved 31 Oct 2026
How to read this. Allegation, response and outcome are separate, dated records. "Decided/resolved" appears only where a cited outcome supports it. Materially affected parties can request a correction via Corrections & response.